|
|
|
|
Scanner type |
Studied FOM |
Agreement |
References |
ECAT EXACT HR+, CPS |
Spatial resolution
Sensitivity
Count rates
Scatter fraction |
about 3 %
< 7 %
good at activity concentrations < 20 kBq/ml
about 3 % |
Jan et al. 2005 |
ECAT HRRT, Siemens |
Spatial resolution
Scatter fraction
Scattered coinc profiles
Count rates |
excellent (< 0.2 mm )
< 1 %
very good (visual)
good (about 10%) |
Bataille et al. 2004 |
Hi-Rez, Siemens |
Scatter fraction
Count rates
NEC curves |
about 1 %
good at activity concentrations < 40 Bq/ml
good at activity concentrations < 40 Bq/ml |
Michel et al. 2006 |
Allegro, Philips |
Count rate
Scatter fraction |
< 8 %
8 % |
Lamare et al. 2006 |
GE Advance, GEMS |
Energy spectra
Scatter fraction |
not reported
< 1 % |
Schmidtlein et al. 2006 |
MicroPET P4, Concorde |
Spatial resolution
Sensitivity
Miniature Derenzo phantom |
about 7 %
< 4 %
visual assessment |
Jan et al. 2003 |
MicroPET Focus 220, Siemens |
Spatial resolution
Sensitivity
Count rates for mouse phantom |
about 5 %
about 3 %
prompt coinc: < 5.5 %
delayed coinc: < 13 % |
Jan et al. 2005 |
Mosaic, Philips |
Scatter fraction
Count rates |
about 5 %
4-15 % |
Merheb et al. 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
